Work Session, 1/7/09

present: Dale, Jeff B., Barbara, Jeff A.

Dale unrolled the triple-poster printout of Marc’s part-2 text [rtf], only to find that instead of the version everyone worked on in the 12/17/08 session, it was a clean copy, and one that had not printed the right-hand third of the last poster. Perfect!

We began with the first five steps of the Vocal Sequence again as a warm-up.

Jeff Allen then gave his new Neo-Futurist monolog to Barbara to read. It was a variation on the “I need to write something” trope, and it worked.

Jeff A. also had us read through “Give & Take,” a hysterical Neo-Futurist skit from 200 more Neo-Futurist plays. It would be fun to add to an evening of theatre.

We returned to part-2. Barbara suggested that we brainstorm as many ways to perform the text as we could thing of. Dale set the timer for two minutes, and we came up with:

  1. a monolog
  2. rearrange pieces of it
  3. backwards
  4. dramatic interpretation
  5. change the verbs
  6. as a dance
  7. mime, holding up the words
  8. metaperformance, like Jeff’s idea from last session
  9. choral anthem
  10. audition piece
  11. diagram the sentences
  12. as a Marx Bros. routine
  13. grade it as homework
  14. edit (??)
  15. make it rhyme
  16. talk back to it, sass it
  17. cycle through film genres
  18. props, without words
  19. hand puppets
  20. nude
  21. as a musical

Dale then used the random number generator to pick one, #4, dramatic interpretation, and we gave ourselves another two minutes:

  1. black box/empty set
  2. Chekhov
  3. political thriller
  4. children’s bedtime story
  5. Noh theatre
  6. gossiping over tea
  7. medieval mystery play
  8. opera
  9. absurdist piece
  10. elementary class play
  11. Julie Andrews vehicle
  12. dysfunctional family drama
  13. police procedural
  14. therapy session
  15. Seussian tale (??not sure of the handwriting)

Again with the random number generator, and again #4, the bedtime story. Barbara began telling us wee ones the bedtime story, and we both interspersed lines and repeated lines and added our own commentary. It was interesting.

We went back to the main list with the random number generator, and we got #1, monolog. Dale tackled it as a solo piece; miraculously, he convinced everyone he was making perfect sense.

Next was #6, dance, and Jeff danced the first page. We then drew #9, choral anthem, and skipped it.

Finally, Barbara took on #12, audition piece, and Dale was her auditioner, requesting expansions and redirections of the piece. Jeff was the janitor.

As a quickie ending, we threw out #15, Marx Bros., and got a couple of laughs with some delivery. Mike Funt: download the text and turn it into a Marx Bros. routine.

It occured to us that we could take the text and do an evening’s work with it, starting perhaps with the monolog so that the audience could get the whole piece at once, then hitting bits and pieces of the text through the filters of our list (and other ideas). The audience would begin to form their own connections and ideas, perhaps.

It was also suggested as a performance that we could have a pool of available texts, to be matched randomly with performance modes, and improvise performances that way.

Ideas for Neo-Futurist monologs:

  • grocery list; e.g., a piece about one’s grocery list, perhaps the one you’d like people to think you have
  • desktop; e.g., what’s on your desk and why

NEXT: Jan. 14, 6:30, NSOD

  • TEXTS: part-2, Jeff’s Myth [doc]
  • PATHS: Vocal Sequence
  • HOMEWORK:
    • Neo-Futurist script
    • five pages of text, either randomly selected from one’s own library, or some online library like Forgotten Books; multiple sources OK

3 thoughts on “Work Session, 1/7/09

  1. I’ll bring a notebook or a tub to start piling our texts into.

    Performing the monolog was fun–I found that I was drawing on all the analysis we did last week to try to give it a dramatic coherence, although of course if you asked me I couldn’t give you a literal throughline of what I meant.

  2. I was thinking–we could profitably use more bodies in our efforts. Any ideas? I’ll send out an email to the “old” Lacuna list, plus the Coriolanians, give or take. What do we think about an article in the paper?

  3. I’ve printed three almost random texts for tomorrow night. I have not written a script. Maybe tonight.

Comments are closed.